Staff Reports
In the latest episode of the New York Times’ ongoing saga of misplaced priorities, reporters recently staged an embarrassing struggle session in reaction to Donald Trump’s unwavering resolve in the wake of two assassination attempts. While most reasonable Americans would see a hero-defending icon at a campaign rally, the Times responded with a hand-wringing medley of disengagement and disdain.
The chilling moment of the first assassination try on July 13, 2024, is etched in the minds of many. As a gunman fired at Trump during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, Americans witnessed a scene that could only be described as legendary. Trump, bloodied but undeterred, defiantly raised his fist to the crowd—a symbol of resilience in the face of danger, an embodiment of the “never back down” spirit that so many conservative voters admire. Trump’s message was loud and clear: he would not be intimidated nor back down from his mission to restore America.
NEW –>> Bless Their Hearts: NY Times Holds Struggle Session After Trump Remains Unbowed by Assassination Attempts https://t.co/vf65Y3YvCi
— Sister Toldjah 💙 (@sistertoldjah) September 30, 2024
Fast forward to the Republican National Convention, just two days later, where Trump made an appearance that left the liberal media aghast. Instead of acknowledging the sheer resolve displayed by Trump, pundits like Ari Melber from MSNBC seized on trivial matters, questioning the necessity of a bandage on Trump’s grazed ear. This fixation on superficialities instead of the truly remarkable nature of Trump’s defiance speaks volumes about the Times’ priorities—viewers quickly recognized the absurdity of their misplaced focus.
In a recent piece, the Times attempted to amplify their disdain even further by dredging up criticism from a group of maintenance staff and anti-Trump college football fans after Trump attended a Georgia-Alabama game. While they may have assumed this would dent Trump’s image, it ironically served as a perfect advertisement for his campaign. As the Times peddled their contrived outrage, the truth hit home: Trump’s ability to persevere and confront adversity resonates deeply with a public tired of cowardice and political correctness.
The disconnect between the New York Times and the average American voter has rarely been clearer. In a country yearning for authentic leadership—especially following nearly four years of the Biden administration—people are drawn to someone like Trump, an individual unafraid to take a stand for traditional values and against the tide of wokeness. It’s no wonder that the Times feels threatened by this reality and resorts to mockery. Their worry is palpable; they know Americans are rediscovering the spirit of resilience that Trump represents.
Despite the Times’ attempts to frame the narrative otherwise, it seems clear that their efforts have only alienated them further from the average voter. Their critiques disguised as articles of serious journalism reveal a desperate attempt to counter a figure who stands resolutely against what many Americans perceive as a disintegrating societal fabric. The outcome of the upcoming election in November promises to either reaffirm or challenge the narrative that Trump has successfully championed—and the New York Times certainly won’t be able to spin that one away.
