Staff Reports
Edward Snowden, a name that has sparked debates hotter than a Fourth of July barbecue, could be on the verge of experiencing freedom in a land he once called home. The shift in the political landscape, courtesy of President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming Cabinet, may offer a glimmer of hope for the infamous whistleblower. With Tulsi Gabbard eyed for the role of Director of National Intelligence and Matt Gaetz in the running for Attorney General, both public figures have put their chips down, advocating for Snowden’s charges to be dropped.
It seems that Gabbard and Gaetz share a belief that Snowden’s actions, while controversial, shouldn’t carry the weight of the world on his shoulders. While many Americans are left scratching their heads over his actions, they argue that the information Snowden revealed about the U.S. government’s spying activities merits a different kind of justice, not the kind meted out by federal prosecutors looking to make an example out of him. However, before anyone starts planning a victory party for Snowden, it’s essential to remember that both Gabbard and Gaetz have to navigate the Senate’s confirmation gauntlet – a task that could rival a high-stakes game of Jenga.
“Waltz is a Jaguar, Sullivan is a Lada”
We examine Trump’s cabinet picks with exclusive comments from Washington D.C. and Zelenskyy’s office who’s “totally ok with Trump”. Watch the gist here 👇🏻 pic.twitter.com/jFPxvjDFLT
— Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) November 20, 2024
The saga began back in 2013, when Snowden handed over thousands of classified documents revealing the NSA’s extensive surveillance on American citizens. His adventure took him from an IT cubicle to tangible infamy, then onto foreign soil where he found refuge in Russia. Claims of espionage and a federal indictment followed, and it seemed the only thing left on his passport was a permanent stamp marked “complicated.”
Gabbard isn’t just advocating for Snowden as a passing fancy. During her presidential campaign back in 2020, she promised to take steps that would lead to the dismissal of all charges against him. Her views are clear: had it not been for Snowden’s revelations, the American public might still be blissfully unaware of the extent of government surveillance, not unlike a fish swimming obliviously in a baby pool filled with sharks.
Not everyone is in Snowden’s corner, however. High-ranking intelligence officials, including Sue Gordon, a former deputy director of national intelligence, argue that Snowden’s leaks did more harm than good. According to her, his indiscretions did not just put American intelligence at risk; they also jeopardized relationships with allies and provided a blueprint for America’s adversaries to exploit. For Gordon, freeing Snowden would be akin to giving a tap dance on the very principles that underpin national security.
As Gabbard and Gaetz make their cases for whittling down the charges against Snowden, watchers are left wondering if this duo can really forge a new path for him. Should they be confirmed, the political chess game around Snowden’s future is set to heat up even further. Whether or not they can turn their promises into action remains to be seen. One thing is certain: the outcome could shape the ongoing narrative of privacy, government oversight, and perhaps even the legacy of Edward Snowden himself.
