President Donald Trump is back at it again, throwing his weight behind the Keystone XL Pipeline and a host of other energy projects that have been stifled by a cadre of Democrats and environmental activists. On his Truth Social platform, Trump indicated that it’s time to stop dragging feet on these vital energy infrastructures that could unleash a tsunami of American energy production. Critics of the current regime’s energy policies have long bemoaned the job losses and soaring energy costs that stem from these misguided decisions, and now, with Trump’s renewed focus, hopes are rising that America’s energy lifeline may finally get the green light.
In a classic case of politicians playing politics, the Keystone XL Pipeline has been mired in delays and outright cancellations under Democratic rule. This project, which would have transported an impressive 830,000 barrels of crude oil daily from Canada to the Gulf Coast, was sabotaged by Biden’s administration shortly after he took office. The irony is hard to ignore—demands for renewable energy resources have left many parts of the country in the lurch, with New England notably resorting to imported natural gas from Russia during a winter crisis because it couldn’t secure enough local supply. And this from a region so close to the Marcellus Shale, one of the richest gas deposits in the world.
Trump claimed he'd "unleash American energy," but as @RepMaxwellFrost pointed out, his plan hikes YOUR costs by taxing Canadian oil we rely on—raising prices from food to clothing. Ignoring the social cost of carbon means polluters profit, while YOUR family pays in health. pic.twitter.com/qOQyEXRPqF
— Accountable.US (@accountable_us) February 26, 2025
Trump is not just fixated on Keystone. His call to revive the Constitution Pipeline—a project stalled by New York environmental regulations—is another beacon of hope for job creation and cost savings. The project would ferry natural gas from Pennsylvania to New England, but bureaucratic red tape has unfortunately left residents scrambling for expensive alternatives. With officials continuing to block this project, nearby residents face a painful reality of high heating costs stemming largely from the lack of accessible local energy sources. Meanwhile, climate crusaders rejoice, seemingly oblivious to the financial impact on average citizens who just want to heat their homes without going bankrupt.
Massachusetts is a perfect example of the folly of anti-fossil fuel zealotry. With officials like Governor Maura Healey ignoring reality in favor of environmental posturing, gas prices are skyrocketing. Ratepayers are now grappling with soaring heating bills, the very scenario Democrats tried to prevent. Instead of admitting the failures of their policies, Healey is merely expressing concern over rising costs, which seems more like a public relations move than any real intent to resolve the issue. As some energy experts have pointed out, her mere commitment to keeping fossil fuels out of her state could be labeled a detrimental stunt more focused on political leadership than economic responsibility.
As energy advocates across the country rally further, there’s a genuine belief that Trump’s assertive stance on pipelines may inspire dormant conversations among reluctant Democrat governors. Although the likelihood of an outright public endorsement from these governors remains slim—due to fear of the political ramifications—they might quietly acknowledge the necessity of affordable energy as constituents voice their gripes over crippling bills that stem from misguided energy policies.
In a world where the infrastructure for American energy is waiting in the wings, one can only hope that this renewed interest combined with Trump’s influence could cut through the noise of environmental groups who are more concerned with their fundraising efforts than with practical solutions. The success of these projects, however, hinges not just on Trump’s backing but on whether states can overcome the unnecessary opposition that sabotages essential developments. In a time when common sense has become a rare commodity in policymaking, the revival of energy infrastructure could be the gift that keeps on giving.