admin
President Trump moved fast this week, publicly declaring his intention to designate the anti-fascist movement known as Antifa a “major terrorist organization” in the wake of the brutal assassination of conservative leader Charlie Kirk. The president framed the action as a necessary step to protect ordinary Americans and to send a message that political violence — especially when it targets patriots and campus speakers — will no longer be shrugged off.
The horror at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025, when Charlie Kirk was gunned down while speaking, shook the country and crystallized the danger posed by politically motivated violence. Millions watched footage, and the suspect was quickly arrested and charged, fueling nationwide outrage and calls for accountability from both citizens and officials.
Journalist Andy Ngo, who has long exposed Antifa’s violent tactics, joined the chorus of conservatives on Newsmax to say this designation is overdue and rooted in real danger conservatives have faced for years. Ngo recounted being assaulted and hospitalised while covering leftist mobs and argued the federal government already has tools to go after violent cells and their backers if given the will to use them.
Legal critics and reflexive media guardians warn that there is no neat statutory mechanism to label a domestic, decentralized movement as a terrorist organization in the same way foreign groups are designated, and they raise First Amendment concerns. Those legal questions are not trivial — but neither should they be an excuse for inaction when Americans are being targeted for their beliefs and for exercising free speech.
The Trump White House has made clear it will pursue every avenue — from criminal RICO investigations to tracking financiers and issuing executive actions aimed at choking off violent networks — and the president has vowed federal resources will be brought to bear. Patriots who want safe streets and safe campuses should welcome a government that treats political violence as the national security threat it is, not as a partisan talking point for the elite media.
Meanwhile, liberal outlets and left-wing pundits are already crying foul, accusing the administration of turning grief into a partisan crusade, but that predictable outrage cannot trump the sober duty of government to protect citizens. Rather than defending violent agitators or playing rhetorical games, responsible Americans demand clear action, serious investigations, and an end to the culture that excuses assault on conservatives.
If this administration follows through — not with virtue-signalling but with prosecutions, asset freezes, and smart law-enforcement coordination — it will restore deterrence and make clear that political violence has a price. The choice is stark: either allow mobs and ideological thugs to terrorize public life, or stand firm for law, order, and the fundamental freedoms that built this nation.
