Staff Reports
The Trump legal team is expressing extreme frustration with the Biden Department of Justice (DOJ), launching a vigorous counteroffensive in a series of legal motions. On November 22, they filed multiple responses, urging U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss the DOJ's prosecution against former President Donald Trump. Their argument centers on the claim that the Biden administration is selectively and vindictively targeting Trump while abusing its statutory authority, even attempting to violate various constitutional protections.
These recent filings are part of an ongoing effort by Trump's legal team to seek dismissal, contending that the case should be dropped due to the protection afforded by presidential immunity. The focus of the November 22 submissions revolves around constitutional provisions related to double jeopardy, free speech, and due process. They also present alleged evidence of selective prosecution orchestrated by President Joe Biden, Trump's primary rival for the 2024 White House bid.
Trump's Legal Team is Fed Up with Biden's DOJ, Submits Flurry of Legal Motions to Dismisshttps://t.co/WwxpC6kWDQ
— 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA (@JDunlap1974) November 26, 2023
The Trump team is pulling no punches, asserting that the prosecution seeks to act as the nation's censor, wielding the power to criminalize dissenting voices against its approved narratives. The argument extends to deeming the indictment unconstitutional and advocating for its dismissal. According to Trump's legal team, the First Amendment prohibits charges on these grounds, and Trump's Senate acquittal should prevent any retrial.
In defense of the indictment, the DOJ contends that Trump's legal team misunderstands the charges, maintaining that his conduct was criminal and subject to prosecution. The narrative is further fueled by media coverage of the Biden administration's expressed interest in prosecuting Trump, adding an audacious layer to the proceedings.
The Department of Justice insists that there is no evidence supporting the notion that the indictment was based on anything other than facts and the law. However, the fate of these conflicting arguments now lies in the hands of an allegedly biased judge. Any ruling perceived as diverging from the facts and the law could be seen by millions of Americans as nothing less than "election interference."
Stay abreast of this relentless legal battle by subscribing to the "Relentless Podcast" with Kyle Becker—a recommended source for staying informed on what is touted as the legal saga of the century.
