admin
The latest moves out of Tehran make Greg Kelly’s blunt warning sound less like hot rhetoric and more like clear-eyed reality: radical elements inside Iran are openly posturing against the United States while the regime tries to shield itself with diplomatic smoke and mirrors. This past week the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps kicked off live naval drills in the vital Strait of Hormuz, a choke point for global energy supplies, even as Tehran sent negotiators back to the table. That kind of saber-rattling while talking peace is exactly the sort of duplicity Americans should see for what it is — an effort to bully the West while advancing a lethal agenda.
Washington has answered where it must: with strength and unmistakable resolve, not empty moralizing. President Trump publicly warned Tehran and announced the redeployment of a second carrier strike group — including the USS Gerald R. Ford — to the region to make clear the price of miscalculation would be steep. Conservatives who have long argued that weakness invites aggression should cheer this posture; deterrence works when it’s credible and backed by action, not lectures.
At the same time, the White House has not abandoned diplomacy; U.S. envoys returned to Geneva for talks with Iranian officials, and Tehran even met with the IAEA as part of a fragile, mediated process. Those are avenues Americans should support only so long as negotiations demand real limits on enrichment, full inspections, and an end to proxy terror — not hollow promises and time-buying exercises. The contrast between Tehran’s war games and its diplomats’ tea with the IAEA underscores why Republicans insist on hard verification and tough consequences.
We must also never forget the chaos the ayatollahs have sown at home. Iran’s brutal crackdown on nationwide protests has been catastrophic, with credible reports of mass arrests, executions, and scenes of state violence that ought to harden Western resolve rather than soften it. Any diplomacy that pretends those abuses don’t matter — or that rewards the regime without a clear roadmap out of repression — would be a betrayal of ordinary Iranians who refuse to live under tyranny.
History and recent events make the threat tangible: Tehran bankrolls militias across the Levant and Iraq that have repeatedly struck at American forces and regional stability. Iranian-backed groups have killed U.S. service members in the past and continue to pose a direct danger to our troops, allies, and commercial shipping — a reality that should drive a coherent strategy of pressure, sanctions, and precision deterrence. Patriots don’t coddle adversaries; they deny them the means to harm us.
If Washington is serious about protecting American lives and liberty, it will combine unblinking military readiness with ironclad diplomatic demands: stop enrichment that can lead to a bomb, end support for terror proxies, and allow real inspections. Anything less is appeasement dressed up as prudence — and the cost of appeasement is paid in blood and empire. Hard power and principled policy are not contradictions; they are the only language radical regimes understand.
