admin
American forces executed a bold operation in Caracas in the early hours of January 3, 2026 that resulted in the capture of Nicolás Maduro and his wife, a move long promised by U.S. law enforcement and pursued by the Justice Department for years. The administration says Maduro will face serious narco-terrorism charges on American soil, finally confronting a regime that exported corruption, violence, and poison into our communities. This was not a reckless stunt — it was the culmination of intelligence, patience, and a refusal to tolerate a criminal cabal that used state power to traffic drugs and terror.
The United Nations Security Council is convening an emergency meeting at Venezuela’s request, a predictable spectacle as regimes that have sheltered Maduro scramble to cast the operation as a violation of international norms. Let them shout; the world has watched Venezuela rot under kleptocracy and lawlessness while American communities drowned in fentanyl and cartel violence. We should be skeptical of the same international institutions that looked the other way while Venezuelan oil and state assets were siphoned off by cronies and militias.
Legal experts and commentators are already drawing the obvious parallel to Manuel Noriega — a dictator brought to account after his regime used the machinery of state to traffic drugs and threaten regional stability. Conservative legal minds watch this with clear eyes: Noriega’s takedown showed America will not be a safe harbor for tyrants who traffic in poison, and if the evidence against Maduro is as deep as alleged, justice must follow even if leftist elites howl. This moment revives an uncomfortable but necessary debate about sovereign immunity when state power is weaponized for transnational crime.
Veterans of the drug war like former DEA attache Wes Tabor have publicly warned that Maduro’s Venezuela became fertile ground for narco-terrorism, gangs such as Tren de Aragua, and cartels that now threaten U.S. streets. These are not abstract warnings — they are field reports from agents who watched Venezuela become a narco-state and who pleaded for decisive action while politicians dallied. Conservatives should listen to people who spent their careers on the front lines: the drug-trade nexus linking Caracas to U.S. fentanyl deaths is real, and dismantling it is a national-security priority.
If anyone needed proof that Maduro’s inner circle sits on ill-gotten gains, Switzerland’s swift decision to freeze assets tied to Maduro and his associates after his arrest sends a sober message — kleptocrats cannot expect safe banking havens forever. European moralizing about sovereignty rings hollow when Swiss vaults and shell companies were used to hide the spoils of a regime that starves its people while enriching cronies. This is how you strike at the financial arteries of a criminal state: not with lectures but with action that hits their wallets and disrupts their networks.
Patriots should demand clarity and oversight, not capitulation. Congress must be briefed, border security must be tightened to cut off the demand that fuels cartels, and our courts must see this case through with the full weight of evidence and due process — because Americans deserve both justice and rule of law. Critics on the left and at the U.N. can posture all they like; ordinary Americans want results: fewer drugs in our cities, fewer cartel networks operating with impunity, and leaders who will act to protect families.
This moment is a crossroads: either the United States retreats into moral relativism and global handwringing, or it stands firm for law, order, and the security of its citizens. To every hardworking American worried about fentanyl, cartels, and corruption, know this: decisive action sends a message that tyranny and narco-terrorism will not find safe harbor in the Western Hemisphere. Hold your leaders accountable to finish the job — bring the evidence, secure the borders, and ensure those who trafficked death pay for it in full.
