Staff Reports
Another day, another attempt by the left to silence and intimidate anyone who dares to stand by Donald Trump. This time, attorney Stefan Passantino has stepped up to file a legal complaint against Michael Teter, the mastermind behind the 65 Project, which is notorious for its relentless campaign to disbar lawyers who support Trump. It seems like some on the left have been busy cooking up tactics to stifle opposing views, proving once again that they don’t play fair when it comes to politics.
Passantino’s complaint, backed by America First Legal, is a bold move to hold Teter accountable for his organization’s attempts to use intimidation and fear as a weapon against lawyers associated with the former president. The tactics employed by the 65 Project amount to nothing more than an echo of McCarthyism, targeting Trump-aligned attorneys with baseless ethics complaints aimed at stifling their ability to practice law without fear of retribution.
/1🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨
We just filed a bar complaint against the Director of “The 65 Project,” Michael Teter, for abusing the attorney grievance process to target and intimidate lawyers affiliated with President Trump.
DETAILS IN THREAD… pic.twitter.com/nXpZmaN3Zi
— America First Legal (@America1stLegal) October 28, 2024
One of the key arguments presented in the complaint is that Teter’s baseless allegations violate established standards of professional conduct. Essentially, the legal document argues that attacking lawyers solely for their association with a particular client or for promoting causes aligned with conservative values not only undermines the legal profession but could also invite a war on freedom of speech. The concern here is clear: if attorneys are penalized for who they represent, then the very foundation of justice and fairness begins to crumble.
Further examination of Teter’s tactics reveals that he relied heavily on media narratives and congressional transcripts rather than any solid evidence of wrongdoing. That’s right, folks—gossip columns and biased news reports seem to be the basis of legal action against Trump supporters. It’s a disheartening reminder of how far some individuals are willing to go to twist the truth in their favor, all in the name of a political vendetta.
As if that weren’t enough, the complaint underscores a chilling revelation about Teter’s ambitions: it allegedly aimed to deter attorneys from representing Trump or anyone remotely associated with him through a “campaign of terror” via a barrage of ethics complaints. The real aim here appears to be punishment, rather than pursuing genuine ethical violations. The legal system was never designed to be a tool for political revenge, yet that is precisely how Teter seems to be wielding it.
In light of Teter’s actions, the complaint calls for an investigation by the Office of Professional Conduct to examine these dubious ethics complaints. It’s a pivotal moment for maintaining civility and ethical standards in the legal profession. After all, if lawyers can’t represent clients based solely on their political affiliations, then true justice becomes nothing more than a farce. This case highlights the crucial need for accountability, especially in a climate where political intolerance rears its ugly head and threatens the very principles upon which the legal system stands.
