In a surprising development, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has announced the urgent need to build a border wall in southern Texas. Adding to the controversy, Mayorkas has issued an order suspending several prominent environmental protection laws to expedite the construction process. Critics argue that this represents a significant disregard for environmental concerns and highlights the Biden administration's determination to advance its open borders agenda.
Mayorkas has pinpointed specific stretches of the border where he intends to erect barriers and roads, asserting that complying with environmental regulations would hinder progress. This move has led some to accuse the Biden administration of prioritizing the accommodation of illegal immigrants over the preservation of natural resources. The decision to waive 26 federal laws, including the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Air Act, has been criticized as a setback for environmental protection.
DHS Secretary Reverses on Biden Pledge, Authorizes Border Security to 'Build the Wall'https://t.co/5blyduwIaO
— Sheri™ (@FFT1776) October 5, 2023
It's important to note that President Biden had pledged during his campaign that no additional border wall would be constructed under his administration. Critics view this as another instance of Biden reneging on his promises and letting down the American people, accusing his administration of prioritizing political interests over national security.
In addition to waiving key environmental protections, the Biden administration is also challenging the existence of a floating wall in the Rio Grande, citing concerns about river navigation. Critics argue that this is yet another example of the administration's misplaced priorities, where accommodating illegal immigrants takes precedence over securing the border and safeguarding American citizens.
A report from the Government Accountability Office has indicated that the construction of this wall has caused substantial damage to sacred sites of American Indian communities residing along the border. Critics argue that this exemplifies the administration's lack of consideration for the adverse effects of its actions.
The situation suggests that the Biden administration may be more inclined to cater to the far-left than to uphold its stated principles of protecting the country and the environment. Waiving environmental laws and constructing a border wall are viewed as inconsistent with the values that Biden and the Democrats profess. Critics see these actions as a concerning departure from their promises, prioritizing politics over the safety and well-being of the American people. They believe it is incumbent upon conservatives to oppose what they see as a reckless and perilous agenda.