Staff Reports
Philip Bump of the Washington Post is at it again, attempting to explain away yet another dubious Joe Biden situation. This individual must be contending for the title of "expert who is incorrect the most often." However, with so many liberal candidates, the title is difficult to earn.
More Fun With Philip Bump as He Tries to Explain Away That Chinese Wire With Joe Biden's Addresshttps://t.co/NbyiNNqOit
— RedState (@RedState) September 29, 2023
First, let's not overlook how Bump dismissed Hunter Biden's claim that he gave his father half of his salary. You would assume that, as a purported journalist, he would follow up on that, but nope! Not Push. Then there was the time he asserted "14 Presidents" had signed a letter against Trump. Except, as many have pointed out, there are not fourteen living former and current American presidents. It turns out he was referring to presidential foundations, and the letter did not even mention Trump by name. Traditional Bump motion.
Washington Post reporter Philip Bump embarrasses himself defending Joe Biden's corruption after simply being asked why Hunter said that he gave half of his salary to his father.
"I have no idea what that means… I feel like you want me to walk out."pic.twitter.com/bQ1ksOuI44
— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) September 2, 2023
Again, a wire was not sent to Joe Biden's home address, as James Comer just said, because that is not how bank wires work. https://t.co/ZCxt5786Vn
— Philip Bump (@pbump) September 28, 2023
The dumbest media dipshit living on this rock we call earth, @pbump, has resurfaced again for yet another near magical self-own. 😂🤡 pic.twitter.com/IjzElE4aK6
— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) September 29, 2023
https://twitter.com/jimstinson/status/1707545451807813978?s=20
Now, Bump is attempting to minimize a Chinese wire that included Joe Biden's address as the beneficiary. Let me explain how wires operate, he says, as if that clarifies everything. It does not clarify why Joe Biden's address was provided. Still, you made a valiant effort. And to add insult to injury, he disabled replies to his post because he anticipated being called out for his ridiculous defense. Discuss having confidence in your argument.
However, we cannot ignore the larger issue at hand. Why is a Chinese company shipping the Bidens over $250,000? This does not seem to concern Bump. Or the potential relationship with the Chinese government. And let's not overlook Joe's earlier assertion that Hunter never received Chinese money. This is conveniently disregarded by Bump. How "journalist" is he?
It is not surprising that Bump has once again raced to Biden's defense. It appears that The Washington Post has no remorse in employing him. At least it gives us something to ridicule and snicker at. The predictable defense of Biden by Bump is merely another instance of the slanted reporting that plagues the mainstream media. It's a genuine shame.
