in

Coercive Control Explains Why Smart Women Stay With Abusers

We watched Megyn Kelly ask a question a lot of Americans have been asking since news about Hayden Panettiere’s death resurfaced this painful chapter: why do professional, smart women stay with abusers? It’s an important question. It deserves an honest answer, not cheap judgment. Below is a clear look at the facts we know and the real reasons survivors stay — and what conservatives who value law, order and human dignity should push to fix.

What the reporting says about Hayden Panettiere and Brian Hickerson

Reports say Hayden Panettiere had spoken publicly in the past about being abused and seeking treatment. Her relationship with Brian Hickerson was long described as on-again, off-again. Police reports and court records cited in news coverage show Hickerson was arrested in connection with domestic-violence allegations against her. He later pleaded no contest to counts related to injuring Panettiere, and a protective or restraining order followed as part of the case resolution. Some outlets also report he was at the location where emergency responders found Panettiere unresponsive. Official authorities are still the ones to state formal findings about her death, and the public record should be respected while investigations proceed.

Coercive control and trauma bonding: the science behind staying

Smart, successful people are not immune to coercive control. That’s the term experts use for a steady pattern of domination — isolation, threats, surveillance and emotional manipulation — that slowly erodes a person’s freedom. Scholar Evan Stark and others have shown this is not just “bad moments,” it’s a strategy that traps people. Add trauma bonding — the powerful emotional tie that forms when abuse alternates with apologies and affection — and even a high-functioning person can feel stuck. It is not failure. It is psychology and pressure engineered by the abuser.

Money, children, reputation and real fear

There are practical reasons, too. Even employed women face real risks if they try to leave: custody fights, losing housing, threats that escalate violence, and the very real impact of abuse on work and health. Public figures also worry about reputation and disbelief. Federal health surveys show intimate partner violence affects millions and often disrupts work, mental health, and daily life. None of this excuses abuse. It explains why leaving is not always simple or safe.

What we should do next — and what conservatives must demand

We can do better. That means stronger enforcement of protective orders, better funding for shelters and trauma care, workplace protections for survivors, and reforms in family courts that prioritize safety. It also means calling abusers to account, not blaming victims for being human. If you care about law and order and about protecting families, push for real solutions: more resources for survivors, clearer paths out of danger, and harsher consequences for coercive control. People like Hayden Panettiere deserved help and justice. The rest of us should make sure the system stops letting abusers rig the rules.

Written by Staff Reports

Empty Rooms at Austin DemocracySummit Undercut Talarico's Texas Pitch

Empty Rooms at Austin DemocracySummit Undercut Talarico’s Texas Pitch

ABC Sues FCC, Says Early-Renewal Probe Is Retaliation After Trump

ABC Sues FCC, Says Early-Renewal Probe Is Retaliation After Trump