Impeachment has become the left’s favorite toy, flung recklessly like a toddler’s tantrum whenever things don’t go their way. Let’s face it, Democrats have turned impeachment into a meaningless circus act. Remember when they couldn’t wait to impeach Trump before he even set foot in the Oval Office in 2016? Then they impeached him twice during his presidency for flimsy reasons. Now, they’re scheming yet another impeachment if they get the House in 2026. It’s not governance; it’s obsession.
Their first attempt fell flat on its face over a call with Ukraine. The second fizzled out just as Trump was exiting office, yet here they are again, ready to be humiliated. Democrats don’t have a leader, they don’t have a plan, but they do have an obsession with Trump that borders on derangement. Now, they’ve outdone themselves with another ludicrous set of impeachment articles.
Enter stage left, some unheard-of Democrat congressman dreaming of fame. What does he propose this time? Impeach Trump for ignoring a Supreme Court ruling on a deported MS-13 gang member. Yes, you read that right. They want Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a suspected gang member, brought back after being deported. Meanwhile, liberals are perfectly fine with Biden ignoring the Supreme Court on student loans. If ignoring the court is impeachable, Biden should’ve been packing his bags years ago.
Impeachment Has Lost All Meaning Thanks to the Dems https://t.co/qIro3SquqB
— David Klug (@davidklugFL) April 29, 2025
This latest stunt reeks of desperation, as Democrats flounder in the polls. They’re like actors in a political soap opera, inventing new plot twists to keep the audience engaged. Who’s their villain? Trump, of course. If they can’t defeat him in an election, they’ll try every trick in the book to eliminate him. Russia collusion, lawfare, endless investigations – the playbook doesn’t change.
Their antics aren’t fooling anyone. Americans see through the show. Every time Democrats throw another Hail Mary pass at impeaching Trump, they expose their own inability to lead. It makes you wonder, are they more interested in governance or just tearing down those they can’t defeat at the ballot box?