Staff Reports
FBI Director Christopher Wray recently found himself under the hot lights of a House Judiciary Committee hearing, as lawmakers clamored for answers regarding an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump. The shocking details revealed that the alleged assassin, a 20-year-old named Thomas Matthew Crooks, had the audacity to fly a drone over the site of a Trump rally. This wasn’t just a case of reckless flying; it was a blatant escalation of the growing threats against conservative figures.
According to Wray, the nefarious act took place in the narrow time window of 3:50 p.m. to 4 p.m. on the day of the rally, just a couple of hours before Trump took the stage. Flying the drone about 200 yards from the former president, Crooks apparently livestreamed the whole ordeal for about 11 minutes, likely assuming this stunt would be the next viral highlight reel on social media. It’s a wonder why so many of these leftist radicals see that flashy drones and public gatherings make for prime opportunities to wreak havoc.
Wray confirms gunman flew drone over Trump rally site hours before assassination attempt https://t.co/pi7YqZ2S0h Wray wields more power over the DC Establishment than J Edgar ever did…the difference is, he didn't use his power against the people…he used it against the…
— PA HAU (@PAHAU6) July 24, 2024
In what may come as a surprise to political observers, the FBI recovered the drone and two explosive devices from Crooks’s car, with a third device found at his home. It’s almost as if this kid thought he could walk away from a serious act of aggression with a smile, but it didn’t quite pan out that way. Instead, the attempt left one dead and two others seriously injured—one of whom just so happened to take a bullet graze to the side of Trump’s head, resulting in a minor ear injury. Trump is proving yet again that he’s as resilient as ever, but it begs the question: how many more security failures need to occur before serious reforms are put in place to protect conservative leaders?
As lawmakers grilled Wray about the FBI’s seeming security oversights leading to this shocking attack, the director’s responses quickly turned into a familiar bureaucratic shuffle. He insisted the bureau was laser-focused on the shooter and his motives, yet the investigation into Crooks’s thinking appears to be about as clear as mud. So far, no manifesto or personal statements have emerged, raising eyebrows about what actually fuels these leftist vendettas against right-leaning personalities. Was it a case of the usual “search for public figures” or something more sinister lurking underneath?
Wray, ever dedicated to maintaining a semblance of transparency, highlighted that investigations are ongoing. However, only in an age of endless Twitter threads and TikTok theories could one interpret “unusually transparent” as satisfying when high-stakes matters like this are involved. The FBI could have been more forthcoming with details, but who, after all, needs clarity when the mainstream media prefers amplifying the noise?
As the investigation supposedly progresses, what remains apparent is the chilling reality: actions like those of Crooks represent a dangerous trend fueled by vitriol against conservatives. While the FBI continues to parse out the details of this incident, it’s becoming blatantly clear that they must reassess their approach to handling threats to public figures, especially those from a conservative background. The drone incident won’t just be a footnote in history—it may mark a new chapter if the left’s continued hostility isn’t checked.
