Kamala Harris has faced significant criticism regarding her handling of foreign policy matters during her time as Vice President. From her limited experience in international diplomacy to her perceived mishandling of key issues, Harris has not demonstrated the leadership necessary to guide U.S. foreign policy effectively. Here’s why many conservatives argue that she is unfit for a foreign policy role.

Lack of Experience and Missteps

Unlike seasoned diplomats or political figures with extensive foreign policy backgrounds, Kamala Harris entered the vice presidency with little direct experience in international relations. Her time as a senator and attorney general focused primarily on domestic issues, leaving her ill-prepared for the complex challenges of global diplomacy. This lack of experience has shown in several instances where she has appeared uncomfortable or unprepared on the international stage.

For example, her trip to Central America in 2021 to address the migration crisis was widely seen as ineffective. During this trip, she failed to secure tangible agreements with foreign leaders and was criticized for her handling of questions related to the border. Her infamous “do not come” message to migrants was seen as a miscalculated and tone-deaf response that did little to address the root causes of migration.

Mishandling of the Afghanistan Withdrawal

One of the most glaring examples of Harris’ foreign policy failures was the chaotic U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021. While President Biden bears ultimate responsibility, Harris, as Vice President, was closely involved in key decision-making processes. The hasty withdrawal led to the rapid collapse of the Afghan government, the rise of the Taliban, and the tragic deaths of American service members during the Kabul airport evacuation. The lack of coordination and foresight in managing this situation has been cited as a significant foreign policy failure under her watch.

Ineffective Stance on China and Russia

Kamala Harris has also been criticized for her handling of major geopolitical rivals like China and Russia. Critics argue that her approach to China has been weak, with little tangible action taken to counter China’s growing influence in global affairs. In dealing with Russia, particularly amid the Ukraine crisis, her responses have lacked the decisiveness and strategic foresight necessary to deter aggression. Harris’ inability to project strength in these situations raises concerns about her capacity to handle critical threats to U.S. interests on the global stage.