The left is at it again, using activist judges to meddle with our great nation’s progress. Liberal biases are strangling our legal system, all aimed at derailing President Trump’s bold initiatives to restore America to its former glory. We see this madness unfolding in courtrooms across the nation. Desperate to push their globalist agenda, they disregard the will of the American people and latch onto every nitpicky technicality they can find.
Take the latest Supreme Court ruling, for instance, a mere case of dotting the “i’s” and crossing the “t’s” over immigration deadlines. The mainstream media wants to blow this up, acting like it’s some crucial blow against our sovereignty. Wrong. It’s another example of overblown liberal theatrics. And then, there’s the judges redistricting the law by siding against our border security measures. We see it with cases like Abrego Garcia v. Noem — an apparent roadblock to cleaning up our immigration system.
It’s disappointing to watch as judges stand in the way of Trump’s logical policies, such as funding cuts to non-taxpayer essentials like the United States Agency for Global Media. Why should our hard-earned dollars prop up media outlets that peddle anti-American narratives worldwide? Yet radicals have got their pockets lined with influence even there.
The Evening Docket (April 22, 2025)https://t.co/FnFlXYSCPn
— RedState (@RedState) April 23, 2025
The swooning over unaccompanied minors and providing them extensive legal services is another liberal scheme to burden the taxpayers. Why should our government be forced to fund legal provocations against its already beleaguered policies? The real victims here are American citizens who see their needs sidelined to aid those here without permission.
Enough is enough. It’s time we take a stand against this endless judicial overreach. These judges, blinded by their own liberal agenda, sabotage what should be clear-cut resolutions. How long will this country suffer under such blatant upturning of justice? Every conservative should ask this simple question: when did the law stop being about right and wrong and start being about left and right?