Staff Reports
In a surprising revelation, a prominent author has alleged that the Mexican government is meddling in American domestic affairs, particularly in the ongoing anti-ICE demonstrations in Minneapolis. Peter Schweitzer, the author of a new book titled “The Invisible Coup,” claimed that certain organizations, like Clues and Mirra, are coordinating with the Mexican consulate in Minnesota to foster a resistance against President Donald Trump. This assertion has certainly stirred the pot, especially as discussions ramp up regarding the USMCA trade agreement and the future of US-Mexico relations.
Schweitzer’s claims suggest that foreign powers, notably Mexico, are not just passive observers but are actively influencing American political dynamics. He points out that the Mexican consulate appears to be closely involved with local groups protesting against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This raises eyebrows about how much influence a foreign government should have in the United States. The timing of these allegations is particularly interesting, given that the USMCA trade deal will soon be under the microscope.
In response to these rather bold claims, the Mexican ambassador to the United States, Estabban McKazuma Baragon, argued that reality tells a different story. He cited a rise in Latino support for Trump, suggesting that instead of working against the President, Mexico has been cooperating with the U.S. on migration issues. Ambassador Baragon highlighted that Mexican migration to the U.S. has sharply dropped and mentioned recent improvements in border security, implying that the Mexican government is part of the solution, not the problem.
Ambassador Baragon also addressed concerns regarding drug violence and cartels, countering the narrative that Mexican officials are failing to control crime. He defended President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador’s administration, stating they have been tough on Mexican cartels, which he claims has led to a decrease in fentanyl-related deaths in the U.S. This assertion adds another layer to the debate about whether Mexico is indeed a partner in combating drug trafficking or whether it holds a different agenda altogether.
Furthermore, the division of responsibilities in tackling drug trafficking and crime between the U.S. and Mexico was highlighted. Ambassador Baragon made it clear that while Mexico is committed to addressing these issues, he expects the United States to play its part as well. This joint effort will involve sharing intelligence and focusing on the financial networks that underpin these criminal activities. It’s a classic case of “it takes two to tango,” where cooperation could potentially lead to a notable reduction in drug-related crimes.
As this story continues to unfold, it raises important questions about the extent of foreign influence in American politics. With the backdrop of the USMCA trade agreement and ongoing security concerns, both nations must keep their lines of communication open, as cooperation will be critical in overcoming these complex issues. Observers will be keenly watching how the rhetoric plays out in the coming months and whether any concrete actions will follow these discussions.
