Staff Reports
Senator Dave McCormick (R-PA) sat down with Alex Marlow on The Alex Marlow Show to lay out a plain-spoken plan: if Republicans want to “secure America’s future,” they have to get serious about competition with China, hold a firm line on Iran, and treat data centers as strategic infrastructure — not backroom boondoggles. He made a clear case that national security and local common sense can, and should, go together. Below is the clip and a straight‑talk take on what this message means for policy and voters.
Why data centers matter — and why we shouldn’t pretend they don’t use power
McCormick rightly called data centers “like the gasoline of the technology revolution.” That isn’t a flashy sound bite — it’s a reminder that these facilities are the backbone of advanced computing, artificial intelligence, and modern commerce. But gasoline needs a steady supply line and safety rules. So do data centers. If political leaders hand developers a free pass and ignore grid capacity, everyone else pays in higher electric bills or brownouts. That’s poor policy and worse politics.
Local control and common sense
The senator pushed the simple idea that local communities should have a real say in where these projects go and under what terms. Translation: developers should build generation capacity or help pay for grid upgrades instead of dumping costs on neighbors. That argument slices through both elite talking points and real voter anger in towns seeing their power bills spike while a tech company whirs away in a nearby field. Republicans who want to win blue‑collar and suburban voters ignore that at their peril.
China, Iran, and the bigger picture
Beyond infrastructure, McCormick tied the data‑center debate to a broader GOP message on competition with China and posture toward Iran. He warned that “China is taking most of its spending and investing in next‑generation capabilities,” and said the U.S. must rebuild its defense and industrial base to keep up. On Iran, he argued for sustained pressure and a robust defense posture — a steady, clear approach rather than confusing dithering. In short: economics, industry, and security are all connected, and policy ought to reflect that reality.
Republicans who want to offer voters more than slogans should amplify this framing: treat high‑tech projects as strategic infrastructure, require developers to help pay for the costs they impose, and make national security policy match the scale of the global challenge. Senator McCormick’s interview with Alex Marlow puts those ideas into a neat package — practical, local, and tied to the big issues voters care about. If the GOP wants to secure America’s future, it starts by thinking like a parent, not a regulator — firm, fair, and focused on outcomes. Now let’s see who in Washington actually follows through.
