If anyone still doubts that the United Nations has run out of new ideas, look no further than their latest declaration: the General Assembly has now labeled slavery as the “gravest crime against humanity.” This is the kind of virtue signaling global elites love—loudly condemning evil that everyone already denounces, while ignoring the disasters happening on their own watch.
Of course, slavery is one of the darkest stains in human history. No decent person questions that. Conservatives have always stood against evil, and this is no exception. But wait a minute—does anyone actually think slavery is still up for debate? This is 2026, not 1826. Why do these bureaucrats waste time passing resolutions about universally accepted truths, instead of tackling real crises—many of which the UN itself helps create?
https://twitter.com/PJMedia_com/status/2037156375109759424
It’s easy for leftist diplomats in expensive suits to sit in New York, pretending to be moral champions. But where is their outrage against the modern-day slavery happening right now in places like China? Where’s the tough talk about forced labor camps, national oppression, and the atrocities committed by authoritarian regimes that, coincidentally, sit on the same council? The hypocrisy is glaring, but don’t expect CNN or MSNBC to mention it.
Let’s also talk about anti-American bias. The UN loves to paint the West, especially the United States, as the eternal villain. They dredge up ancient history to scold Americans while ignoring the heroic sacrifices made by Americans to end slavery, both here and around the world. The truth is, it was the American spirit—rooted in freedom and God-given rights—that eventually crushed slavery. Maybe if the UN actually learned something from America, the world would be a safer, freer place.
Meanwhile, families across this country are struggling with open borders, rising crime, and a culture under attack. But the globalists lecture us about evils we already defeated centuries ago, while coddling dictators and radical ideologues. If the UN really cared about justice, maybe they’d start by looking in the mirror. Or is that too much to ask from an institution that can’t even define basic human rights?

