The debate over Jesus Christ’s burial site centers on two locations: the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, venerated by Catholic and Orthodox traditions, and the Garden Tomb, favored by many Protestants. While both sites hold significance, archaeological and historical evidence leans toward the Holy Sepulchre as the more likely candidate.
### Historical Tradition
The Church of the Holy Sepulchre has been recognized since the 4th century, when Emperor Constantine’s mother, Helena, identified it as the site of Jesus’ crucifixion and burial. Early Christian tradition consistently placed Golgotha and the tomb within Jerusalem’s city walls, aligning with the Holy Sepulchre’s location. By contrast, the Garden Tomb gained prominence only in the 19th century, proposed by scholars like Charles Gordon based on its skull-like rock formation and proximity to a garden.
### Archaeological Evidence
Critically, the Garden Tomb’s authenticity is challenged by archaeological dating. Excavations indicate the tomb was carved in the 8th–7th century BCE (Iron Age), reused during the Byzantine era (5th–7th century CE). This timeline disqualifies it as a “new tomb” described in John 19:41, which would have been unused at the time of Jesus’ burial. The Holy Sepulchre, however, contains a tomb consistent with 1st-century Jewish burial practices and lies near a recognized ancient execution site.
### Biblical Alignment
The Gospel of John specifies Jesus was buried in a garden near Golgotha (John 19:41–42). While the Garden Tomb’s serene setting matches this description, the Holy Sepulchre also once lay within a garden, as evidenced by ancient wine presses and cisterns. Additionally, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre places the tomb just yards from its proposed Calvary site, fitting the Gospel accounts of a close proximity between crucifixion and burial.
### Denominational Perspectives
Protestant preference for the Garden Tomb often stems from its simplicity and separation from the ornate Holy Sepulchre, which is shared by multiple Christian denominations. However, recent scholarship, including evangelical voices like Pastor Jeremiah Johnston, acknowledges the Holy Sepulchre’s stronger historical claim despite its crowded, less “garden-like” modern appearance.
In conclusion, while the Garden Tomb offers a compelling visual and spiritual experience, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre remains the most archaeologically and historically plausible site of Jesus’ burial and resurrection.