Staff Reports
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson faces an ethics complaint asserting that she deliberately withheld information about her husband's income from malpractice consulting. Filed by the Center for Renewing America, the complaint urges the Judicial Conference not to overlook these ethics concerns, particularly in light of the left's history of targeting conservative Supreme Court justices. Additionally, the complaint questions whether Jackson properly reported the private funding sources for her investiture celebration at the Library of Congress. The Center for Renewing America emphasizes the importance of promptly addressing these issues to uphold public trust in the judiciary.
The complaint underscores a purported pattern of intentional omissions and questionable conduct by Jackson. It contends that she initially disclosed her husband's medical malpractice consulting fees in 2011 but subsequently omitted them from later filings, posing potential recusal issues and conflicts of interest due to the inherent connection between her husband's work and the legal field. The letter to the Judicial Conference urges an official investigation into Jackson's actions and suggests referral to the Attorney General for further examination.
Ethics Complaint Against Liberal Supreme Court Justice Referred to Judicial Conference Committee🤔 https://t.co/x3Hqjhomp2
— kevin waterbury (@WaterburyKevin) January 16, 2024
Another concern raised is Jackson's failure to disclose private funding sources for her investiture celebration. The complaint argues that this deliberate omission obstructs the identification of potential conflicts of interest and undermines public trust in the decision-making process of the courts. It asserts that Jackson's failure to report such private funding constitutes a violation of ethics laws, especially in light of her reporting gifts, such as $6,580 in designer clothes from Vogue Magazine.
In summary, the ethics complaint against Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson brings forth substantial apprehensions regarding her alleged pattern of intentional omissions and potential conflicts of interest. The Center for Renewing America contends that addressing these allegations promptly is crucial for upholding the equal application of the law and preserving public confidence in the judiciary.
