Staff Reports
The grand theater of justice continues to unfold in Fulton County, as the lead prosecutor in the case against Donald Trump, Nathan Wade, recently found himself stumbling through a House Judiciary Committee investigation while trying to explain his connections with the Biden White House. Apparently, during his tenure as a special prosecutor—while allegedly having an affair with District Attorney Fani Willis—Wade seemed to selectively forget key details about his engagements with the highest levels of government.
Wade, whose credentials as a divorce lawyer had everyone scratching their heads when he was handed a position in such a high-profile case, was the mastermind behind the alleged interference in the 2020 election. For the cushy paycheck of nearly $700,000, one might expect more than a man who couldn’t recall meeting with White House officials a mere six months prior to his testimony. His memory appeared to be on a permanent vacation, with Wade managing to forget details in a staggering 58 instances during his interview.
BREAKING: Prosecutor Nathan Wade admitted to multiple meetings with the Biden-Harris White House during Fani Willis's prosecution of Donald Trump in Georgia but repeatedly claimed, "I don't recall" or "I don't remember" the details of those meetings. pic.twitter.com/B2tSpWgAD0
— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) October 21, 2024
Wade’s revelations about Ms. Willis’s intentions to investigate Trump shortly after the controversial 2020 election suggest a long-standing vendetta rather than a reaction to any wrongdoing on Trump’s part. This shows a level of premeditation that flies in the face of impartiality, raising eyebrows not only about the integrity of the case but also about the motivations behind it.
Not one to leave things unbilled, Wade charged Fulton County for consulting with White House lawyers as it pertained to a case against the former president. Let’s take a moment to admire the audacity here—someone boasts about valuable “working hours” while completely forgetting the essential players in the room. It’s almost like being at a family reunion and mixing up aunt Edna with the neighbor’s cat—it just doesn’t happen. And Wade’s lack of clarity didn’t stop there. Even understanding the racketeering charges against Trump required a crash course from an expert—so much for an experienced prosecutor.
As the unfolding circus continues, Ms. Willis even moved to block Wade’s testimony, claiming it would lead him to divulge “confidential information.” One has to wonder how much of this supposed confidentiality was simply about covering tracks and ensuring that the affair—and dubious practices—stay off the record.
The narrative emerging from this saga places the spotlight squarely on the dubious ethical practices surrounding the prosecution while highlighting concerns about political motivation at the core of this entire ordeal. As the Democrats in charge try to push forward with charges against Trump, it’s clear that the only verdict so far is on the justice system itself, which appears to be bending to the political whims of the current administration.
