admin
The recent Saturday Night Live sketch featuring Jon Hamm and Bowen Yang as gay parents sparked intense debate about its underlying message. While the skit’s surface-level humor mocks invasive questions about surrogacy and pronouns, deeper analysis reveals a cultural inflection point. Here’s the breakdown:
—
###
The sketch centers on a gay couple (Hamm and Yang) abruptly introducing a baby to friends, who demand answers about its origin. The couples’ defensive reactions — accusing friends of homophobia for asking “Where’s the mother?” or declaring “English is my eighth language” to dodge scrutiny — satirize progressive rhetoric used to shut down debates. The punchlines highlight societal discomfort with surrogacy’s ethical ambiguities, such as:
– The couple joking they “like to think of it as she stole us” when pressed about adoption.
– Deflecting questions about biology by claiming “two moms” status based on stereotypes (long hair, shopping habits).
– Mocking pronoun debates with “she/they — until he tells us otherwise”.
Conservative commentators argue the sketch “admits what the media won’t say”:
– Surrogacy commodifies children and erases motherhood.
– Identity politics often replace logical answers about family structures.
– Even progressive institutions now ridicule “woke” avoidance tactics.
—
###
While some claim the skit normalizes surrogacy by framing it as mundane, the tone leans toward skepticism:
– The heterosexual friends’ confusion mirrors public unease with “designer babies” and ethical gray areas.
– Lines like “How does a gay couple have a baby by accident?” underscore the absurdity of treating parenthood as a casual lifestyle choice.
– The baby’s sudden appearance (after a rave called “Bulge Dungeon”) hints at reckless decision-making.
Critics like Michael Knowles argue the sketch’s humor derives from acknowledging the “disordered” reality of surrogacy — a departure from SNL’s traditionally pro-LGBTQ stance. Meanwhile, progressive outlets like Out dismiss it as “pandering to right-wingers”.
—
###
The show’s angle remains ambiguous:
– The skit’s mockery of pronoun obsessions and surrogacy taboos aligns with growing conservative critiques. MAGA supporters celebrated it as evidence of a “cultural shift”.
– SNL’s ratings have plummeted in recent years, and this sketch’s viral backlash/approval suggests a bid for relevance by courting both sides.
– While the skit ridicules progressive parenting myths, it avoids moralizing — leaving audiences to sit with “the discomfort of that silence”.
—
###
Whether calculated or sincere, the sketch reflects a broader cultural reckoning. Even left-leaning media now satirize topics once deemed untouchable, signaling fatigue with performative wokeness. As Matt Walsh noted, “The tide may be turning” on surrogacy and gender ideology. For now, SNL’s “hidden agenda” seems less about normalization than exploiting societal cracks for laughs — but the laughter itself speaks volumes.
