admin
California is facing a dangerous new law disguised as a privacy measure, and independent journalist Nick Shirley is right to sound the alarm. Shirley confronted lawmakers in Sacramento, arguing that Assembly Bill 2624 would make it harder to expose fraud tied to taxpayer-funded immigration services and could chill citizen journalism that holds government and nonprofits accountable. This confrontation and the growing outcry should be a wake-up call for every patriot who cares about transparency.
AB 2624, authored by Assemblymember Mia Bonta, officially aims to extend address-confidentiality protections and related safeguards to people who work for immigration support services, modeled after California’s existing Safe at Home program. The bill’s text adds new prohibitions on posting personal information or images online when done with certain malicious intents, and it establishes an address confidentiality program within the Secretary of State’s office. Those technical-sounding details matter because they create loopholes that can be abused to hide wrongdoing under the banner of “privacy.”
Despite the reassurances from bill sponsors, the Assembly quietly moved the measure forward and it passed the Assembly on May 26, 2026, signaling that the political class is more interested in protecting institutions than protecting taxpayers. Lawmakers voting en masse to advance this bill should know that massaging the law to favor political allies will not sit well with voters who pay the bills. This is the kind of insider-friendly legislation that fuels suspicion and cynicism among everyday Californians.
Conservative voices rightly point out that the bill’s language could be interpreted to criminalize the publication of identifying information about employees of taxpayer-funded entities, effectively muzzling independent watchdogs. Republican Assemblymember Carl DeMaio warned that the measure “criminalizes citizen investigative journalists who take video,” a concern echoed by Shirley as he pressed Democrats about whether the law would shield fraud. When lawmakers dodge straightforward questions from the public and a journalist on the Capitol steps, it tells you all you need to know about their priorities.
State Democrats, including Assemblymember Bonta, insist AB 2624 is about safety and privacy for vulnerable workers and not about silencing critics, calling some of the backlash misinformation. But it’s impossible to ignore the optics when powerful legislators push through statutes that limit transparency while claiming public interest as cover, especially given the personal connections at play. Voters should demand clear, enforceable safeguards that protect both privacy and the right to investigate without fear of prosecution.
This isn’t just a Sacramento fight; it’s a frontline battle for accountability. When government expands secrecy under vague pretexts, hardworking Americans lose the ability to root out corruption and protect taxpayer dollars from waste and fraud. Conservatives must stand unmistakably for sunshine laws, citizen journalism, and the principle that no program funded by taxpayers should be beyond scrutiny.
If AB 2624 becomes law in its current form, it will be remembered as the “Stop Nick Shirley Act” by those who value truth and oversight, because that’s exactly how it reads to anyone who’s watched bureaucrats dodge tough questions. Now is the time for citizens to call their representatives, demand rollbacks to any language that hampers investigative reporting, and insist that privacy protections never become a shield for fraud.
